|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
29/03/2021 |
Actualizado : |
29/03/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Autor : |
FERNANDEZ, E.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; FERRARO, B.; LANFRANCO, B. |
Afiliación : |
ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN MANUEL SOARES DE LIMA LAPETINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO FERRARO ALBERTONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO ANTONIO LANFRANCO CRESPO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Alternativas de producción para la cría: ¿más kilos de ternero o de vaca?- |
Complemento del título : |
Socio-Economía. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, 2021, no.64, p.51-54. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 64). |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
A menudo visualizamos el éxito de los sistemas de cría vacuna casi exclusivamente a través de la eficiencia reproductiva del rodeo y la tasa de terneros destetados1.
Sin embargo, ¿cómo se explica la actitud de muchos productores frente a la tecnología? Existe una lógica respecto a la acumulación de ganado como activo de resguardo que explica el mantenimiento de un exceso de carga (dotación) en el campo y que a menudo trae complicaciones en momentos de falta de forraje. Pero? ¿eso es todo? |
Palabras claves : |
SISTEMA MULTI-PRODUCTO; UNIDAD ECONOMIA APLICADA - INIA. |
Thesagro : |
CRIA VACUNA; PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL; PRODUCTORES GANADEROS. |
Asunto categoría : |
E10 Economía y políticas agrícolas |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15413/1/Revista-INIA-64-Marzo-2021-p-51-54.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01216naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1061891 005 2021-03-29 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E. 245 $aAlternativas de producción para la cría$b¿más kilos de ternero o de vaca?-$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 490 $a(Revista INIA; 64). 520 $aA menudo visualizamos el éxito de los sistemas de cría vacuna casi exclusivamente a través de la eficiencia reproductiva del rodeo y la tasa de terneros destetados1. Sin embargo, ¿cómo se explica la actitud de muchos productores frente a la tecnología? Existe una lógica respecto a la acumulación de ganado como activo de resguardo que explica el mantenimiento de un exceso de carga (dotación) en el campo y que a menudo trae complicaciones en momentos de falta de forraje. Pero? ¿eso es todo? 650 $aCRIA VACUNA 650 $aPRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL 650 $aPRODUCTORES GANADEROS 653 $aSISTEMA MULTI-PRODUCTO 653 $aUNIDAD ECONOMIA APLICADA - INIA 700 1 $aSOARES DE LIMA, J.M. 700 1 $aFERRARO, B. 700 1 $aLANFRANCO, B. 773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, 2021, no.64, p.51-54.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
12/02/2021 |
Actualizado : |
12/02/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
Autor : |
SCHONS, R.M.T.; LACA, E.A.; SAVIAN, J.V.; MEZZALIRA, J.C.; SCHENEIDER, E.A.N.; CAETANO, M.; ZUBIETA, A.S.; BENVENUTTI, M.A.; CARVALHO, P.C. DE F. |
Afiliación : |
R.M.T. SCHONS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Grazing Ecology Research Group. RS, Brazi; E.A. LACA, University of California. Department of Plant Environmental Sciences. Davis, CA, USA.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay / Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Grazing Ecology Research Group. RS, Brazil.; J.C. MEZZALIRA, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Grazing Ecology Research Group. RS, Brazil.; E.A.N. SCHENEIDER, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Grazing Ecology Research Group. RS, Brazil.; M. CAETANO, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Grazing Ecology Research Group. RS, Brazil.; A.S. ZUBIETA, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Grazing Ecology Research Group. RS, Brazil.; M.A. BENVENUTTI, Agri-Science. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queenland, Australia.; P.C. DE F. CARVALHO, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Grazing Ecology Research Group. RS, Brazil. |
Título : |
´Rotatinuous` stocking: An innovation in grazing management to foster both herbage and animal production. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Livestock Science, March 2021, Volume 245, Article number 104406. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104406 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104406 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 23 April 2019 / Received in revised form 30 November 2020 / Accepted 17 January 2021 / Available online 20 January 2021. |
Contenido : |
?Rotatinuous? stocking is a grazing management strategy based on animal behavioural responses to sward structure which is designed to maximize herbage intake per unit of grazing time. It is an alternative to traditional grazing management practices focusing on pasture use efficiency and maximizing herbage accumulation and harvesting. To investigate this approach, Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) pastures grazed by sheep were evaluated in 2014 and 2015 under two contrasting grazing management strategies. Paddocks were distributed under a complete randomized block design with four replicates. Grazing management strategies were: traditional rotational stocking (RT), with pre- and post-grazing sward heights of 25 and 5 cm, respectively, and ?Rotatinuous? stocking (RN), with pre- and post-grazing sward heights of 18 and 11 cm, respectively. Thirty-two castrated Texel × Polwarth crossbred lambs were randomly allocated to treatments. As a consequence of grazing strategies, the stocking cycles were 12 and 4, with resting periods of 13 and 35 days, respectively, for RN and RT treatments.
Herbage production, total herbage harvested, and feed conversion efficiency were 28%, 20%, and 40%, respectively, greater for RN than for RT treatment. Although the stocking rate was lower, the average daily gain per animal and live weigh gain per hectare were 153% and 43%, respectively, greater for the RN treatment.
Despite the RN treatment being orientated to maximize herbage intake per unit of grazing time, it results in greater total herbage production and harvesting. We conclude that the ?Rotatinuous? stocking strategy is not necessarily reversed by low herbage harvesting efficiency. This innovation in grazing management conciliates high herbage and animal production at the same time. Menos?Rotatinuous? stocking is a grazing management strategy based on animal behavioural responses to sward structure which is designed to maximize herbage intake per unit of grazing time. It is an alternative to traditional grazing management practices focusing on pasture use efficiency and maximizing herbage accumulation and harvesting. To investigate this approach, Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) pastures grazed by sheep were evaluated in 2014 and 2015 under two contrasting grazing management strategies. Paddocks were distributed under a complete randomized block design with four replicates. Grazing management strategies were: traditional rotational stocking (RT), with pre- and post-grazing sward heights of 25 and 5 cm, respectively, and ?Rotatinuous? stocking (RN), with pre- and post-grazing sward heights of 18 and 11 cm, respectively. Thirty-two castrated Texel × Polwarth crossbred lambs were randomly allocated to treatments. As a consequence of grazing strategies, the stocking cycles were 12 and 4, with resting periods of 13 and 35 days, respectively, for RN and RT treatments.
Herbage production, total herbage harvested, and feed conversion efficiency were 28%, 20%, and 40%, respectively, greater for RN than for RT treatment. Although the stocking rate was lower, the average daily gain per animal and live weigh gain per hectare were 153% and 43%, respectively, greater for the RN treatment.
Despite the RN treatment being orientated to maximize herbage intake per unit o... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
HERBAGE HARVEST; INTAKE RATE; PASTURE PRODUCTION; ROTATIONAL STOCKING; SHEEP PERFORMANCE; SWARD STRUCTURE. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 02907naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1061721 005 2021-02-12 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104406$2DOI 100 1 $aSCHONS, R.M.T. 245 $a´Rotatinuous` stocking$bAn innovation in grazing management to foster both herbage and animal production. 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received 23 April 2019 / Received in revised form 30 November 2020 / Accepted 17 January 2021 / Available online 20 January 2021. 520 $a?Rotatinuous? stocking is a grazing management strategy based on animal behavioural responses to sward structure which is designed to maximize herbage intake per unit of grazing time. It is an alternative to traditional grazing management practices focusing on pasture use efficiency and maximizing herbage accumulation and harvesting. To investigate this approach, Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) pastures grazed by sheep were evaluated in 2014 and 2015 under two contrasting grazing management strategies. Paddocks were distributed under a complete randomized block design with four replicates. Grazing management strategies were: traditional rotational stocking (RT), with pre- and post-grazing sward heights of 25 and 5 cm, respectively, and ?Rotatinuous? stocking (RN), with pre- and post-grazing sward heights of 18 and 11 cm, respectively. Thirty-two castrated Texel × Polwarth crossbred lambs were randomly allocated to treatments. As a consequence of grazing strategies, the stocking cycles were 12 and 4, with resting periods of 13 and 35 days, respectively, for RN and RT treatments. Herbage production, total herbage harvested, and feed conversion efficiency were 28%, 20%, and 40%, respectively, greater for RN than for RT treatment. Although the stocking rate was lower, the average daily gain per animal and live weigh gain per hectare were 153% and 43%, respectively, greater for the RN treatment. Despite the RN treatment being orientated to maximize herbage intake per unit of grazing time, it results in greater total herbage production and harvesting. We conclude that the ?Rotatinuous? stocking strategy is not necessarily reversed by low herbage harvesting efficiency. This innovation in grazing management conciliates high herbage and animal production at the same time. 653 $aHERBAGE HARVEST 653 $aINTAKE RATE 653 $aPASTURE PRODUCTION 653 $aROTATIONAL STOCKING 653 $aSHEEP PERFORMANCE 653 $aSWARD STRUCTURE 700 1 $aLACA, E.A. 700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V. 700 1 $aMEZZALIRA, J.C. 700 1 $aSCHENEIDER, E.A.N. 700 1 $aCAETANO, M. 700 1 $aZUBIETA, A.S. 700 1 $aBENVENUTTI, M.A. 700 1 $aCARVALHO, P.C. DE F. 773 $tLivestock Science, March 2021, Volume 245, Article number 104406. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104406
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|